OAXES
CATHOLIC PROPHECY
FALSE CATHOLIC PROPHECIES
PROPHECIES
OF MALACHY AND COLUMBKILLE
THE
MARIAN MOVEMENT OF PRIESTS
The Roman Catholic Church boasts about certain holy people and
apparitions predicting the future. The
Bible, which the Church says is God’s word, in Deuteronomy 18 has God saying
that a prophet who predicts and is always right but who makes one error is a
fake for he is not from God or speaking under divine inspiration. He has to be destroyed by the people. Yet the Catholic Church has canonised false
prophets! Yet the Catholic Church
doesn’t struggle very hard or sometimes it does nothing at all to silence
false prophecy.
The Catholic
publishing company TAN, published an extraordinary book on Catholic forecasts
of the future. Written by Yves Dupont,
the book is called Catholic Prophecy, the Coming Chastisement
(
Mother Shipton,
astrology and Nostradamus are all in favour in this book which makes it so
unusual. It is hard to imagine a true
Catholic having this view.
The whole book
can be refuted in one paragraph if Christ’s scriptural prophecy that he would
come back when it was least expected is true.
The prophecies describe the reign of fake popes, the counterfeit
Catholic Church, persecution and the near decimation of the true Church and
the murder of holy popes. This tells
us we can be sure that Jesus will not come back yet when they have not come
to pass yet.
Saints who made
this blunder were St John of the Cleft Rock, Pope Pius IX, St Thomas Beckett,
St Hildegard, St Vincent Ferrer (alleged worker of 40,000 miracles), Blessed
Johannes Amadeus de Sylva, St Francis of Paola, St Anthony of the Desert, St
Louis-Marie Grignion de Montfort and St Margaret Mary. And the important mystic, Augustinian nun
and stigmatist, Blessed Anna-Katharina Emmerick (1744-1824) cannot be
omitted.
Page 29: St Vincent Ferrer said that Christians will
eventually believe that the sacrament of confirmation is unnecessary and that
these will all leave the faith to follow Antichrist’s false religion. The implication is that the sacrament is
necessary for preserving you in the faith.
Such a doctrine
is an insult to Protestant martyrs who were never confirmed validly in the
eyes of
Page 32: St Margaret Mary who had visions of the
Sacred Heart said that the devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus was the
final effort of Jesus to make people love him in the last days.
This at a
stroke denies the authenticity of any subsequent apparition including
Page 52, Jeanne
le Roye, a sister of the Nativity, had revelations which she burned during a
fit of doubt. Her revelations were
written down by her spiritual director thirty years later. This was in 1790 and she died eight years
later. She did not have to burn the
prophecies at all. It is a bizarre
thing to do. This is a classic excuse
for making a new book full of prophecies made after the event or prophecies
that are good guesses that look better if they were allegedly made years
before the indications of where things are going today came about.
None of the
prophecies listed in the Dupont book have been inexplicably fulfilled.
Page 69,
Emmerick says that one day the Church will all into total immorality and the
true faith will exist only in a few places and be reduced to handful of
families. Obedience is not due to
heretical bishops or even heretical popes so schism would be the result.
Jesus would not
tell her such a thing for it would lead only to schism and indeed has led to
the formation of many dissident Catholic Churches today – eg the formation of
the True Catholic Church and the Society of St Pius V. Dupont neglected to inform us that this
Lady’s revelations have been altered by her secretary Clemens Brentano
(Twenty Questions about Medjugorje, page 18).
Obviously, if she really had received visions from God, God would have
been able to preserve them.
Chapter 4 is on
Nostradamus and it approves of the astrology he used to develop his prophetic
quatrains. Dupont says that a verse
saying that
He says that
the prophecies are extremely hard to make sense of until the events are past
(page 99). So you could make them mean
any number of things.
Nostradamus
used symbolism a lot which confuses things further.
Nostradamus was
alleged to have meant by, “at forty-five and others from forty-one, forty-two
and thirty-seven” (page 99) the degrees of latitude where the Anglo-Americans
went to when they landed at
The 41 and 42
cannot stand for latitude when they landed at
If there are
strange coincidences it does not take a miracle to explain them.
The Dupont book
discusses the famous prophecies of St Malachy and Columbkille,
Page 19, St
Malachy from the twelfth century predicted all the popes by giving mottos for
each one that are so short that each one could describe any pope at all. Crux de Cruce, Cross from a Cross, is Pius
XI who had to carry the cross of the Italian Revolution which was helped by
the
St Pius X was
Ignis Ardens, The Burning Fire. This
fire is supposed to be World War I. If
he had been alive when the atomic bombs were dropped on
Pastor et Nauta
or Shepherd and Sailor was John XXIII who hailed from
The stigmatic
nun, Elena Alello received a revelation in 1960 about a Third World War which
would see Russia taking over Europe and the Virgin told her that all people
on earth must be told about this for it is to happen soon (Please come
Back to Me and My Son, page 20).
This prophecy has failed and cannot be fulfilled now with the collapse
of communism.
The
manifestations to Sr Agnes Sasagawa in
The Irish
visionary and stigmatist, Christina Gallagher of Mayo, has offered no proof
or miracle that she really has had the experiences she said she had.
The absurd
message of 1988 that has Mary telling Christina that when she cries with pain
and because of Satan that Mary cries as well (page 34) is laughable for Mary
would be having a nervous breakdown by now if that were true for she would be
crying over everybody! Or does she
single out Christina to cry about?
What would that say about all the other apparitions in the world? Does Mary not care about these other
visionaries or are they just fakes?
Contrary to
what Jesus said about the need for us to judge fairly the Virgin says we must
never judge for only God should (page 40).
On one
occasion, Christina thought that Jesus had abandoned her and Jesus explained
that he had to forsake her a bit because he had other little ones to help
(page 47). This denies that God is
all-powerful.
Gallagher
believed that everything she foresaw about worldwide signs and warnings and
punishments would happen before the twentieth century would end (page 53).
The book was checked and approved by her and her heavenly visitors so
this is a false prophecy. And it was
simply untrue that 1992 was the year that suffering would peak for
Who knows –
perhaps it is not Christina who makes the false prophecies but the historical
Jesus? There is no way of proving that
it isn’t Jesus when most of his appearances have told lies we have to
mistrust him. They refute his
infallibility and reliability.
I don’t believe in apparitions that promise
that God will prove his existence and the ugliness of sin to the whole world
in a miracle (page 53). He should have
done it long ago. Sin is his fault for
he did not try hard enough to convert us.
On
The healing
miracles are interesting. One has a
man cured of a possible tumour or abscess through an operation! (page
73). And why did none of the cured let
their names be published?
Fr Rene Laurentin
was impressed by her and even quoted her messages in his books with
approval. He did not put her in the
section for apparitions without credibility in his book (page 82). That says a lot about him. She was approved by the Ukrainian
visionary, Josyp Terelya, who heard her name called in a heavenly
locution. Little did he know that he
refuted his own visions in doing so.
Christina had visions of Padre Pio who she named as one of her special
protectors. What business has a
heavenly power sending Pio as a saint when he was not canonised by the
Church? Visions are inferior to the
Church and visions say that for they command obedience to the
In 1990, Jesus
told Christina that the three sins annoying him most at that time as
abortion, sacrificing babies to the devil and sexual abuse of children. Jesus complained that the faith was dying
and being corrupted in the Church so that the true Catholics were
uncommon. Why did the corruption of
the faith not bother him most? It is
supposed to be a worse sin than abortion for it can lead to abortion and
those other things.
It is unfair
that the Catholic Church censures apparitions that are heretical and forbids
them and allows belief in unauthenticated visions. If a vision is not authenticated and is
believed then one may be saying God did something he never did and that is a
heresy! One should not believe but
still avail of and heed the messages and check everything and pray in
relation to the vision until it is authenticated. Modern visions imply the Church is right to
do these things which proves what they are.
There is a book
of revelations called The Way of Divine Love. Sr Josefa Mendenez wrote them as they were
dictated by Jesus to her. The German
edition of her account of visions and messages dropped her revelation that Mary
made Jesus a robe when he was a child and the robe fitted him even when he
grew for it grew itself by the power of God.
Jesus asked the visionary to hate her evil flesh and consider it
cursed. That was struck out too. This palming off a fraud as somebody who
made no doctrinal mistakes was noted by Catholicism’s greatest modern
theologian, Karl Rahner (page 40, Objections to Roman Catholicism). The visionary reported as well that the
Devil appeared in the shape of Jesus and Mary and she could not tell the
difference. So what she had to do was
ask the apparition to praise God and if it was the Devil it could not do
it. This is illogical for the Devil
could insincerely praise. Does she
think the Devil would not have led the Jews of the gospels to praise God for
enabling them to get Jesus crucified?
The Devil will give a bad criterion for seeing which apparition is
from God or him so that he will be able to fool. Her apparitions were all of the Devil if
they were not hallucinations or lies.
The important
mystic and stigmatic, St Catherine of
It is known now
that the vision of Mary to St Simon Stock to reveal the devotion of the
scapular and the Sabbatine Privilege to him is a dubious legend (page
24).
The famous
saint, Vincent Ferrer, who has the honour of being the most powerful
miracle-worker in the Church having performed a staggering 40,000 miracles
supported the Clementine Roman Catholic Church. This was a breakaway Church led by a line
of antipopes and was headquartered in
The two
mystics, Ferrer and St Catherine of
The appearances of Our Lady of the Miraculous Medal in Rue de Bac,
Paris, in 1830 show that the veneer of credibility that the Church casts over
her ability to authenticate apparitions is totally artificial. The information comes from The Evidence
for Visions of the Virgin Mary.
The visionary was a nun called Catherine Laboure, aged 24 who entered
the convent the same year she had the first visions. She was hardly a few days in the convent
until she claimed that she had a vision of the heart of St Vincent de
Paul. All the accounts agree that she
was desperate to have a vision of the Blessed Virgin and often prayed to her
guardian angel and St Vincent de Paul that this would happen. Before the first Marian vision, Catherine
was convinced that her wish would be granted and went to bed on the night of
The false prophecies, the fact that the devotion of the Miraculous
Medal made it easy for Pius IX to lead the Church further away from the Bible
and reason by making it obligatory to believe that Mary was conceived without
original sin all prove that the vision was not from Heaven. Against the rule of St Francis de Sales
that visions should not be desired, Catherine was rewarded by her desperate
wish to see Mary with a number of apparitions of her. This sanctions her sinful desire. Francis declared in the Church approved
book, Introduction to the Devout Life, chapter 37, that there is much
vanity and deceit in desiring visions and ecstasies for they are so dangerous
to the soul. He did not approve, he
said, of people desiring things that they did not need in their calling. Nobody saw Catherine having her first
vision so she could have been lying or deluded herself. The second was not noticed though she was
in chapel praying with the community but they did think she was in ecstasy. Little attention was paid to her trance and
she was not tested for fakery. She hid
her identity for years so that people knew there was an alleged visionary
they did not know who she was. So
there was no way of knowing if she was sane at the time she had her
visions. She would need a lot of
contact with people to be able to work out if there was any psychosis
there. But she was a recluse from the
outside world as nuns are. Apparitions
are more convincing when they are spontaneous.
The Miraculous Medal apparitions prove that the Church is lying when it
says it only accepts an apparition as true and of divine origin when there is
no logical alternative for there are more convincing apparitions. The conversions worked by the medal only
prove that the story behind the medal turned people on not that the story was
true. And the conversions cannot be
attributed solely to the medal. When
people prayed for sinners to convert they appealed to a lot of different
devotions and saints. The argument
that the apparitions were true because of the alleged fruits is itself a
fraud and another indication that the apparitions were satanic for they led
to lies and delusion. When the blood
of Jesus is the fountain of grace in Catholicism one would expect Mary to
have a medal done for it instead of herself for it is better to stress the
foundational things. Most people only
wear about one medal and she is making sure that it is one of her own. Odd.
These things create so many puzzles that it is wiser to not believe in
them at all.
The Marian
Movement of Priests is a cult in modern Roman Catholicism.
It is staunchly
conservative and is rabid in its devotion to the pope for it follows his
directives forbidding contraception regardless of the harm this does. That’s one example.
The Movement is
based on the interior locutions of Fr Don Stefano Gobbi.
The messages he
“hears” in his heart are mostly from Mary.
Thus his book, which has changed titles, is called Our Lady Speaks
to Her Beloved Priests. The
edition I am working with is titled, To the Priests, Our Lady’s Beloved
Sons.
The messages
stress that nothing but the service of Mary and her interests should be of interest
to you so you should avoid newspapers and TV (July 8, 1973). This implies that there should be no small
talk but only talk about Mary. It is
just like the Hare Krishnas only being interested in talking about
Worse, she says
she wants this all the time (
The Virgin
declared that she was the woman wearing the sun, with the moon under her
feet, and with twelve stars making a crown on her head who was described in
the Book of Revelation (November 30, 1974).
This is wrong for Revelation never says that Mary is the woman or that
the baby she has who will rule all nations is a real baby. The vision seems to stand for
In the same
locution, she stated that she was the sole sign from God to the modern Church
and the modern world. This rejects all
visions and all miracles that do not directly relate to Mary. Visions of Jesus are declared
inauthentic. But there are many events
that are more acceptable as supernatural than Gobbi’s revelations. The weak testament cannot destroy the
stronger one.
The Lady
promises that all the needs of priests who try to be as poor as they can be
will be met (January 23, 1974). What
is the use in being poor if you are okay?
She says that she will help us with the weaknesses God sends (August
21, 1973) which means that when God put the weaknesses into us it was a
foolish sick joke.
Sweetly, she
says that Jesus loves us unconditionally and then she says that she loves us
as long as we are trying to grow out of our faults, “My Son Jesus does not
love you for what you can do, but for yourself: He loves you just as you are. It is not your merits but only his love
which draws Him strongly to you, I also, your Mother, love you just as you
are: even with your defects, as long as you are always striving to correct
them” (
As for bad
priests, we are to be kind to them without judging them for any reason or at
any time for that is not our place (July 9, 1975). Obviously, this counteracts the approval of
the Bible for legal and fair judging.
Jesus advocated honest judgement in the Sermon on the Mount.
The spurious
visions of
In the last
decade of the twentieth century, the Lady said that the great tribulation
that the Bible speaks about and which she spoke of in her apparitions will
take place – then, the world will suffer more than ever before (September 18,
1988). She said that all the secrets
she disclosed in her apparitions will be revealed. Some of the Third Secret of Fatima is still
confidential and
If they are
conditional elsewhere they are not here.
She said that
the great departure from the true faith that was foreseen in Second
Thessalonians has taken place (June 11, 1988). The Lady says the time is at hand for the
return of Jesus to the earth. This
could encourage schism from
The dangerous
secret of La Salette was approved by Mary in the same revelation. It says
There are
allegations of Satanism and deliberate evil against masonry and the book says
that the black beast and the horns in Bible prophecy refer to masonry (405,
406). Even locutions from Heaven have
no right to make such statements without verification.
Gobbi is
inventing the messages.
In 1994, Gobbi
said on Mother Angelica Live that all the secrets of locutions and
apparitions would be opened to the world by the end of the century. Gobbi was asked if the same would be true of
Medjugorje and its ten secrets and he claimed that he did not know. But all secrets would include its as well
if Medjugorje is true, and it is according to his Virgin. A declaration from the Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith came later and it denied that there was anything of
heavenly origin in the revelations Gobbi received. It ruled that he should even stop
attributing his messages to Mary in the title of his book so the title was
changed to, To Her Priests. Gobbi was
lying about not knowing about Medjugorje for the Virgin told him in 1987 that
she was appearing there and that in that very year the secrets she told there
would be revealed. Evilly, he had this
revelation struck out of his book in 1991 (see The Medjugorje Deception,
pages 299-300). That was because there
had come official decrees from the Church challenging the supernatural nature
of Medjugorje and forbidding anybody to say the apparitions were definitely
supernatural.
This Lady lived
in the twentieth century and wrote a book called Poem of the Man-God
based on alleged revelations made to her concerning the life of Jesus
Christ.
The Catholic
Church put her drivel on the Index.
The book, The Holy Shroud and the Visions of Maria Valtorta defends
her. It says the Church put her on the
Index of Forbidden Books as a precaution though the L’Osservatore Romano said
it was a terribly fictionalised story about Jesus. It is difficult to believe that the
Catholic Church would treat a book that way when it was not sure. The books placed on the Index were read and
examined thoroughly first. Some
mistakes were made but it was generally accurate about what Catholics ought
and ought not to read. An appeal to
the Church court would have rehabilitated it if the Church was wrong.
Her book
authenticates the dubious Shroud of Turin and claims that the Shroud was left
in a pile in the tomb. But the John
Gospel implies that it was probably folded when the head band was.
The Monsignor’s
book states that some errors of a historical nature were made in her
book. He argues that they do not
disprove the authenticity of the revelation.
She even made a mistake about which hand was on top on the Shroud and
corrected this in her typescript after the error was made. Revelations need to provide evidence and
hers should be perfect so that that might be a proof and Jesus had plenty of
time to keep her right when he was so talkative with her. Theology is connected with history. If you admit small errors in the
resurrection story then how do you know that some small detail that throws a
different light on it was forgotten or misinterpreted? For example, the headband in the tomb might
have been significant to some people who knew Jesus for perhaps they knew
there was a man who should not have known about it and who claimed not to
have been at the tomb implying he had been there and doing something
suspicious with Jesus’ body. Revelations
have to be totally error-free.
The amount of
hugging other men that Jesus does in it makes him look like a gay man and he
even kissed James on the mouth and James falls asleep in his arms. And Jesus even supposedly said that no one
can be a sinner if they sin for the love of God. One anachronism she has put in the book is a
reference to screwdrivers being used at the time of Jesus. She also said she heard Mary call God
Jehovah in her vision. But that name
was not invented until centuries later.
God’s name is Yahweh.
(Critique: “Poem of the Man-God” Medugorje’s Gospel by Brother James,
http://members.lycos.co.uk/jloughnan/critique.htm).
Anne Catherine Emmerich was born in 1774 in
She wrote a
book on her revelations but a layman, Clemens Brentano, rewrote them so we
can’t be sure of them anymore (page 18, Twenty Questions about Medjugorje). If God went to the trouble of giving her
long visions and had Brentano taking notes meaning he wanted them to be
preserved why didn’t he find some way to preserve the authentic account? The revelations have to be false when God
failed. The Holy Shroud and Four
Visions argues that that Bretano turned the notes he took as she dictated
into poetical language resulting in inaccuracies but it says that since her
visions of the suffering of Jesus match the Turin Shroud the errors are few
(page 16). But the Turin Shroud does
not depict Christ. If the Shroud is a
miracle then Christ was a fraud. The
Shroud cannot be the winding sheet of Jesus and its existence would be
evidence that miracles prove nothing at all and can mislead. Jesus said his miracles proved what he was
saying was true and with the Shroud we would have physical evidence against
him. And physical evidence for him is
something that we don’t have even with the gospels which only give
questionable and too brief testimonies for him. Why then did Brentano get rid of the
original notes? Catherine got a
revelation saying that God wanted Bretano to write her notes so if he lied it
is more her fault than his. She called
him the Pilgrim because he had the role of being pilgrim to the sacred place
of her side from which revelations from Heaven were to be received.
According to her visions, the cross of Jesus was the usual shape but
Christ was fastened to two arms going upwards in a Y shape. But the victims of crucifixion carried one
beam to the execution site but this kind of cross would be ready made and the
whole thing would have to be carried.
Also it is unnecessarily ornate.
Catherine’s vision of the cross seems to have more to do with the Y shaped
cross in her parish chapel than Jesus.
She described a scourging at the pillar that is so horrific (page 27, The
Holy Shroud and Four Visions) that it is
strange the gospels did not say that and which is inconsistent with the
gospel that Pilate was anxious to save Jesus and too bad a scourging could
kill. Yet her revelation says the
gospels are infallible in all matters.
She reports as fact the fictitious story that was made up centuries after
the Church began that Veronica wiped the face of Jesus. Veronica means true icon so she was made up
for there was a picture of Jesus on cloth that some wished to link with the
time of Christ.
Emmerich claimed that the leg of Jesus was broken out of its socket to
make it stretch on the cross for a hole for the nail was too far away for the
leg to reach. Death rapidly ensued if
the legs were unable to support. But
Jesus was on the cross for a few hours.
The Turin Shroud is supposed to back this up which if correct is
another reason it is not Jesus’ cloth.
Emmerich saw the arms being stretched unnaturally and it is thought
that the Shroud man had arms broken out of the sockets. This makes it all worse for her
claims. These details are on page 39
to 44 of The Holy Shroud and Four Visions.
Mark recorded
Pilate’s surprise that Jesus died so soon.
Mark made no effort to prove the resurrection and he just said it
happened. Don’t you think he would
have said if the stretching had killed his Lord prematurely? The evidence must have been confused and
unconvincing when Mark could find so little to say.
What was Emmerich doing with stigmata in her palms if she saw Jesus
nailed through the wrists? She never
saw this at all. When God gave her a
cross on her breast to match the cross in the vision it follows the stigmata
would match the vision too.
In her visions of the Virgin Mary’s house at
Even if Brentano invented many of these things it is certain that many
of these errors were originally Catherine’s.
Now if stigmata is meant to be a miracle that provides evidence for
the faith and it is accompanied by visions then it must bear witness to the
visions as well. If the visions are
false then the stigmata was faked even if there is no physical proof. Her visions and wonders really undermine
the Church so if her stigmata and visions and ability to live for years
without food are real the Catholic Church is not the true
Emmerich hid her stigmata and swore those who bandaged them to secrecy
but the doctors spilled the beans.
Stigmata would not prove she was a saint so what had she to be ashamed
of – exposure?
Ballinspittle,
Moving Statues and Faith, Tim Ryan and Jurek Kirakowski, Mercier Press,
Beauraing and
Other Apparitions, Fr Herbert Thurston, Burns, Oates & Washbourne,
Believing in
God, PJ McGrath,
Bernadette of
Biblical
Exegesis and Church Doctrine, Raymond E Brown, Paulist Press,
Catholic
Prophecy, The Coming Chastisement Yves Dupont, TAN,
Comparative Miracles, Fr Robert D Smith, B. Herder Book Co,
Counterfeit Miracles, BB Warfield, The Banner of Truth Trust,
Cults and
Fanatics, Colin & Damon Wilson,
Divine Mercy in
My Soul, Sr M Faustina Kowalska, Marian Press,
Eleven
Evidence of
Satan in the Modern
From Fasting
Saints to Anorexic Girls, Walter Vandereycken and Ron van Deth, Athlone
Press,
Fatima in
Lucia’s own Words, Sr Lucia, Postulation Centre,
Fatima
Revealed…And Discarded, Brother Michael of the Holy Trinity, Augustine,
From the
Visions of the Venerable Anne Catherine Emmerich, Topic Newspapers,
Mullingar, undated
Garabandal, a
Message for the World, Ave Maria Publications, Middleton, Co
Introduction to
the Devout Life, St Francis de Sales, Burns Oates and Washbourne Limited,
Looking for a
Miracle, Joe Nickell, Prometheus Books,
Miracles in
Dispute, Ernst and Marie-Luise Keller, SCM,
Miracles,
Ronald A Knox, Catholic Truth Society,
Mother of
Nations, Joan Ashton, Veritas,
New Catholic
Encyclopedia, The Catholic University of America and the McGraw-Hill Book
Company, Inc., Washington, District of Columbia, 1967
Objections to
Roman Catholicism, Edited by Michael de la Bedoyere, Constable,
Our Lady of
Beauraing, Rev J.A. Shields, M.A., D.C.L., M.H. Gill and Son, Ltd.,
Padre Pio,
Patrick O Donovan, Catholic Truth Society,
Please Come
Back to Me and My Son R Vincnet,
Powers of
Darkness, Powers of Light, John Cornwell,
Rosa Mystica,
Franz Speckbacher, Divine Mercy Publications,
San Damiano, S
di Maria, The Marian Centre, Hungerford, 1983
Spiritual
Healing, Martin Daulby and Caroline Mathison, Geddes & Grosset, New
St Catherine
Laboure of the Miraculous Medal, Fr Joseph I Dirvin C.M., Tan,
The Apparition
at Knock, A Survey of Facts and Evidence, Fr Michael Walsh, St Jarlath’s
College, Tuam, Co Galway, 1959
The Apparitions
of the Blessed Virgin Mary Today, Rene Laurentin, Veritas,
The Appearances
of the Blessed Virgin Mary at the Grotto of Lourdes, JB Estrade, Art &
Book Company Ltd, Westminster, 1912
The
Autobiography of St Margaret Mary, TAN,
The Book of
Miracles, Stuart Gordon, Headline,
The Cult of the
Virgin Mary, Michael P Carroll,
The Evidence
for Visions of the Virgin Mary, Kevin McClure Aquarian Press, Wellingborough,
Northamptonshire, 1985
The Exaltation
of the Virgin Mary, by Rev S.G. Poyntz, M.A., B.D., Association for Promoting
Christian Knowledge, Dublin, 1955
The Holy Shroud
and Four Visions, Rev Patrick O Connell and Rev Charles Carty, TAN,
The Holy Shroud
and the Visions of Maria Valtorta, Msgr Vincenzo Celli, Kolbe Publications
Inc.,
The
Incorruptibles, Joan Carroll Cruz, Tan,
The Medjugorje
Deception, E Michael Jones, Fidelity Press,
The Physical
Phenomena of Mysticism, Fr Herbert Thurston, Burns, Oates & Washbourne,
The Sceptical
Occultist, Terry White, Century,
The
Supernatural A-Z, James Randi, Headline Books,
The Thunder of
Justice, Ted and Maureen Flynn, MAXCOL,
The Turin
Shroud is Genuine, Rodney Hoare, Souvenir Press,
The Two Divine
Promises, Fr Roman Hoppe, TAN,
The Virgin of
the Poor, Damian Walne and Joan Flory, CTS,
The Way of
Divine Love, Sr Josefa Mendenez, TAN,
The Wonder of
Guadalupe, Francis Johnson, Augustine,
To the Priests,
Our Lady’s Beloved Sons, Fr Gobbi, The Marian Movement of Priests, St Paul’s
Press, Athlone, 1991